[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: support for git commit --amend/--signoff
From: |
Štěpán Němec |
Subject: |
Re: support for git commit --amend/--signoff |
Date: |
Fri, 11 Jun 2010 18:14:18 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> writes:
> If we only consider Git's and DaRCS's forms of amend, I'd say that the
> "Amend:" header might be a good approach, and that it should specify the
> revision/patch that's amended. So for Git, you could have a command
> that inserts "Amend: <SHA-1>" and then the backend could check that the
> SHA-1 is the right one (which would avoid accidental use).
No idea about Darcs, but `git commit --amend' always changes the tip of
the current branch, you can't specify another commit to amend; so the
above would not be useful in this case (same for --signoff).
Štěpán
- support for git commit --amend/--signoff, Dan Nicolaescu, 2010/06/11
- Re: support for git commit --amend/--signoff, Juri Linkov, 2010/06/11
- Re: support for git commit --amend/--signoff, Dan Nicolaescu, 2010/06/11
- Re: support for git commit --amend/--signoff, Stefan Monnier, 2010/06/11
- Re: support for git commit --amend/--signoff,
Štěpán Němec <=
- Re: support for git commit --amend/--signoff, Stefan Monnier, 2010/06/11
- Re: support for git commit --amend/--signoff, Dan Nicolaescu, 2010/06/11
- Re: support for git commit --amend/--signoff, Juri Linkov, 2010/06/12
- Re: support for git commit --amend/--signoff, Stefan Monnier, 2010/06/12
- Re: support for git commit --amend/--signoff, Dan Nicolaescu, 2010/06/19
- Re: support for git commit --amend/--signoff, Stefan Monnier, 2010/06/23
- Re: support for git commit --amend/--signoff, David Kastrup, 2010/06/23
- Re: support for git commit --amend/--signoff, Miles Bader, 2010/06/23
- Re: support for git commit --amend/--signoff, Dan Nicolaescu, 2010/06/23
- Re: support for git commit --amend/--signoff, Dan Nicolaescu, 2010/06/23