[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: The unwarranted scrolling assumption
From: |
Lennart Borgman |
Subject: |
Re: The unwarranted scrolling assumption |
Date: |
Fri, 18 Jun 2010 02:12:23 +0200 |
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 1:59 AM, Lennart Borgman
<address@hidden> wrote:
>
> For width 55 there is the bug I described before.
>
> For width 56 things seems to work better.
Forgot to say:
- In the 55 case line 702 is wrapped in 3 parts and you are in the
middle part when you are on W.
- In the 56 case it is wrapped in 2 parts and you are at the bottom
part when you are on W.
- Re: The unwarranted scrolling assumption, (continued)
- Re: The unwarranted scrolling assumption, Stefan Monnier, 2010/06/18
- Re: The unwarranted scrolling assumption, Lennart Borgman, 2010/06/18
- Re: The unwarranted scrolling assumption, Lennart Borgman, 2010/06/18
- Re: The unwarranted scrolling assumption, Lennart Borgman, 2010/06/17
- Re: The unwarranted scrolling assumption, Lennart Borgman, 2010/06/17
- Re: The unwarranted scrolling assumption, Lennart Borgman, 2010/06/17
- Re: The unwarranted scrolling assumption, Lennart Borgman, 2010/06/17
- Re: The unwarranted scrolling assumption,
Lennart Borgman <=
- Re: The unwarranted scrolling assumption, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/06/18
- Re: The unwarranted scrolling assumption, Lennart Borgman, 2010/06/18
- Re: The unwarranted scrolling assumption, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/06/19
- Re: The unwarranted scrolling assumption, Lennart Borgman, 2010/06/19
- Re: The unwarranted scrolling assumption, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/06/19
- Re: The unwarranted scrolling assumption, Lennart Borgman, 2010/06/19
- Re: The unwarranted scrolling assumption, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/06/19
- Re: The unwarranted scrolling assumption, Lennart Borgman, 2010/06/19
- Re: The unwarranted scrolling assumption, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/06/19
- Re: The unwarranted scrolling assumption, Lennart Borgman, 2010/06/19