[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: save-excursion again
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: save-excursion again |
Date: |
Fri, 25 Jun 2010 23:20:01 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
> Which brings up a question for Stefan. Are you saying that the
> condition-case-save-point-and-mark aspect of `save-excursion' should
> be abstracted out (say as `save-region') and separated from the
> save-buffer aspect?
Not sure what you mean. If you mean we should introduce
a save-excursion-but-not-buffer, then I think it's a bad idea, because
such a thing would still have to save a marker (so there's no
improvement in terms of the amount of data saved) and the semantics of
"restore point in another buffer" is murky in Emacs.
Stefan
- Re: save-excursion again, (continued)
- Re: save-excursion again, Stefan Monnier, 2010/06/18
- Re: save-excursion again, David Kastrup, 2010/06/18
- Re: save-excursion again, Uday S Reddy, 2010/06/18
- Re: save-excursion again, Stefan Monnier, 2010/06/18
- Re: save-excursion again, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/06/19
- Re: save-excursion again, Lennart Borgman, 2010/06/19
- Re: save-excursion again, Lennart Borgman, 2010/06/19
- Re: save-excursion again, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/06/19
- Re: save-excursion again, Lennart Borgman, 2010/06/19
- Re: save-excursion again,
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: save-excursion again, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/06/25
- Re: save-excursion again, Stefan Monnier, 2010/06/30
- Re: save-excursion again, Uday S Reddy, 2010/06/26
- Re: save-excursion again, Stefan Monnier, 2010/06/30
- Re: save-excursion again, Lennart Borgman, 2010/06/30
- Re: save-excursion again, Uday S Reddy, 2010/06/19
Re: save-excursion again, Davis Herring, 2010/06/18