[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Selection changes in revno 100822

From: Miles Bader
Subject: Re: Selection changes in revno 100822
Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2010 21:35:15 +0900

Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:
>> >> But, then shift-selected text would be inconsistent with other methods of
>> >> selection
>> >
>> > Which "other methods" are those?
>> The usual ones, e.g., "C-@ <movement>"
> Given Jan's clarifications, doesn't Emacs on X put any selected text
> in the primary selection, no matter how it was selected?

No, if you select text with "C-@ <movement", it doesn't (you have to do
"C-w" to get it in the primary), though now that I test it,
"shift selected" text _does_ get put in the primary (lame!).

Sometimes I think this stuff is just completely random...


"Suppose He doesn't give a shit?  Suppose there is a God but He
just doesn't give a shit?"  [George Carlin]

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]