[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
keyboard politics [Was: Key bindings proposal]
From: |
Xah Lee |
Subject: |
keyboard politics [Was: Key bindings proposal] |
Date: |
Sat, 14 Aug 2010 14:22:31 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.9.2.8) Gecko/20100802 Thunderbird/3.1.2 |
Uday Reddy wrote:
> Microsoft never made any complete systems. They started out as
sellers of
> compilers and made their name as the *suppliers* of DOS to IBM. When
IBM's
> monopoly ended and the PC became an open architecture, they became
suppliers to
> us. So, they do not have ownership of the PC or the keyboard that
goes with
> it. Their assertion of ownership to a pair of modifier keys, whose
idea has
> been long in existence before their birth even, is illegitimate.
the way i'm guessing how the Win logo became common in PC keyboard is this:
Microsoft invented the key and logo (probably influenced by Apple), and
place it on the keyboard they manufacture, as well integrated in their
OS for use of that key. Perhaps in a year or two, other keyboard
manufactures, in competition with Microsoft's hardware department, also
wanted to have that key, because MS's OS is very popular.
i'm not sure if there's anything explicitly sinister about how it came
to became so popular.
keyboard manufactures do not have to make keyboard with that key or
logo. Daz, Happy Hacker keyboards, Optimus, Kinesis, sell versions of
keyboard that don't have the win logo. ( photo & link:
http://xahlee.org/emacs/keyboards_hacker_idiocy.html )
though it'd be nice if someone knows about this history and tell us.
Xah
- keyboard politics [Was: Key bindings proposal],
Xah Lee <=