[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bzr send workflow
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: bzr send workflow |
Date: |
Mon, 23 Aug 2010 01:33:15 -0400 |
> From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <address@hidden>
> Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2010 13:14:25 +0900
> Cc: Stefan Monnier <address@hidden>, address@hidden
>
> I don't think that having Stefan merge Eli's changes is efficient
> use of anybody's time.
(and vice versa) I agree completely.
> AFAIK Stefan et al are already as willing to accept merge directives
> as any other form of patch. It wouldn't hurt to advertise that
> option, of course. But I really don't think it's a solution to the
> current bottleneck.
100% agreement.
Unless we have a clerk whose job is committing bundles sent by others,
and unless that clerk is on a very fast link, this suggestion will not
resolve the root cause of the problems being discussed here.
- Re: bzr send workflow, (continued)
- Re: bzr send workflow, Juanma Barranquero, 2010/08/25
- Re: bzr send workflow, Chong Yidong, 2010/08/26
- Re: bzr send workflow, Juanma Barranquero, 2010/08/26
- Re: bzr send workflow, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/08/27
- Re: bzr send workflow, Wojciech Meyer, 2010/08/27
bzr send workflow (Was: Locks on the Bzr repository), Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/08/22
Re: bzr send workflow, Bojan Nikolic, 2010/08/22
Re: bzr send workflow, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/08/23
Re: bzr send workflow,
Eli Zaretskii <=