[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: base
From: |
Juanma Barranquero |
Subject: |
Re: base |
Date: |
Tue, 24 Aug 2010 19:22:40 +0200 |
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 18:38, David Kastrup <address@hidden> wrote:
> I did not intend any irony.
Ah, sorry. Sometimes it's hard to be sure (not you, I mean in e-mail).
> If you want to go looking for it
Not specially, but
> it may be
> that git/Schindelin are doing a better job convincing people that
> Windows is just not worth the trouble than Emacs/Stallman are.
I'm not so sure. Schindelin is convincing people of something, that's
for sure. I just think it's not polite to say of what.
> That turned out not pretty.
Understatement? :-)
Juanma
- Re: base, (continued)
- Re: base, Andreas Schwab, 2010/08/24
- Re: base, Juanma Barranquero, 2010/08/24
- Re: base, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/08/24
- Re: base, Leo, 2010/08/24
- Re: base, Juanma Barranquero, 2010/08/24
- Re: base, Óscar Fuentes, 2010/08/24
- Re: base, Juanma Barranquero, 2010/08/24
- Re: base, David Kastrup, 2010/08/24
- Re: base, Juanma Barranquero, 2010/08/24
- Re: base, David Kastrup, 2010/08/24
- Re: base,
Juanma Barranquero <=
- Re: base, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/08/24
- Re: base, Frank Schmitt, 2010/08/24
- Re: base, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/08/25
- Re: base, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/08/25
- Re: base, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/08/25
- Re: base, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/08/25
- Re: base, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/08/25
- Re: base, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/08/25
- Re: base, Óscar Fuentes, 2010/08/25
- Re: base, Bernardo Barros, 2010/08/25