[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: base
From: |
Leo |
Subject: |
Re: base |
Date: |
Tue, 24 Aug 2010 19:00:44 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (Mac OS X 10.6.4) |
On 2010-08-24 18:35 +0100, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
> It's true that specification of revisions in git is unfamiliar. But
> both hg and bzr have been forced to add git notation by popular
> demand. And I think it would be very odd for someone who's familiar
> with operators like "nthcdr" (which is "~" in git revision notation)
> to complain about it. It's rare to need any other notation (except in
> quite specialized situations).
Most of time the revision notations can be ignored. I didn't know any
revision notations for a long time but still productive thanks to magit.
A ~200 lines of document is there ('git help revisions' to see it) so I
feel confident because I can just look it up whenever I need it.
Leo
- Re: base, (continued)
- Re: base, Frank Schmitt, 2010/08/24
- Re: base, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/08/25
- Re: base, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/08/25
- Re: base, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/08/25
- Re: base, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/08/25
- Re: base, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/08/25
- Re: base, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/08/25
- Re: base, Óscar Fuentes, 2010/08/25
- Re: base, Bernardo Barros, 2010/08/25
- Re: base, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/08/25
- Re: base,
Leo <=
- Re: base, Juanma Barranquero, 2010/08/24
- Re: base, Miles Bader, 2010/08/24
- Re: base, Juanma Barranquero, 2010/08/24
- Re: base, Miles Bader, 2010/08/24
- Re: base, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/08/24
- Re: base, Miles Bader, 2010/08/24
- Re: base, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/08/25
- Re: base, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/08/25
- Re: base, Uday S Reddy, 2010/08/25
- Re: base, Juanma Barranquero, 2010/08/25