Re: raw-byte and char-table

[Miles Bader]

Kenichi Handa <address@hidden> writes:
> Perhaps we should not call "byte" as "unibyte char", rename
> the above funciton to "byte-to-char", and document it as:
>
> (byte-to-char BYTE)
> Convert the byte BYTE to a character representing BYTE.
...
> Likewise multibyte-char-to-unibyte => char-to-byte:

Those names seem a bit more clear to me as well.

-Miles

-- 
Monday, n. In Christian countries, the day after the baseball game.