[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Key bindings proposal
From: |
Davis Herring |
Subject: |
RE: Key bindings proposal |
Date: |
Mon, 30 Aug 2010 14:39:39 -0700 (PDT) |
User-agent: |
SquirrelMail/1.4.8-5.el5_4.10.lanl3 |
> But then there needs to be an unambigous way to specify an underscore
> itself as an accelerator char. Perhaps `___' (3 or them) could (be
> made to) do that.
"___" (with any following character) is already a literal underscore and
an accelerator-prefix, so that doesn't work. You'd have to have "__U" be
a literal underscore and "__A" be an accelerator underscore (leaving all
other "__?" patterns undefined for future expansion).
Davis
--
This product is sold by volume, not by mass. If it appears too dense or
too sparse, it is because mass-energy conversion has occurred during
shipping.
- Re: Key bindings proposal, (continued)
- Re: Key bindings proposal, Jason Rumney, 2010/08/27
- Re: Key bindings proposal, Juri Linkov, 2010/08/27
- Re: Key bindings proposal, Stefan Monnier, 2010/08/27
- Re: Key bindings proposal, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/08/28
- Re: Key bindings proposal, Stefan Monnier, 2010/08/30
- RE: Key bindings proposal, Drew Adams, 2010/08/30
- Re: Key bindings proposal, Lennart Borgman, 2010/08/30
- RE: Key bindings proposal, Drew Adams, 2010/08/30
- Re: Key bindings proposal, Lennart Borgman, 2010/08/30
- Re: Key bindings proposal, Andreas Schwab, 2010/08/30
- RE: Key bindings proposal,
Davis Herring <=
- Re: Key bindings proposal, Jan Djärv, 2010/08/31
- Re: Key bindings proposal, Lennart Borgman, 2010/08/31
- Re: Key bindings proposal, Jan Djärv, 2010/08/31
- Re: Key bindings proposal, Lennart Borgman, 2010/08/31
- Re: Key bindings proposal, Jan Djärv, 2010/08/28
- Re: Key bindings proposal, Jason Rumney, 2010/08/27
- Re: Key bindings proposal, Jan Djärv, 2010/08/28
- Re: Key bindings proposal, Jason Rumney, 2010/08/28
- Re: Key bindings proposal, Jan Djärv, 2010/08/28
- Re: Key bindings proposal, Jason Rumney, 2010/08/28