[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: e and pi
From: |
Stephen J. Turnbull |
Subject: |
Re: e and pi |
Date: |
Sat, 18 Sep 2010 23:27:39 +0900 |
Eli Zaretskii writes:
> Every identifier mentioned in the appropriate ANSI or Posix
> standards as a standard function is also reserved.
"Reserved" means "we reserve to right to produce garbage or a syntax
error if you try to use these as regular identifiers". If you
redefine a standard function, though, the compiler and linker are
still supposed to do the right thing, and your program should still
work (as long as you're consistent, and understand that you can't have
the standard version of a function, and your replacement). And of
course if you export those identifiers, you're not allowed to claim
standard conformance.
- Re: e and pi, (continued)
- Re: e and pi, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/09/18
- Re: e and pi, Helmut Eller, 2010/09/18
- Re: e and pi, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/09/18
- Re: e and pi, Helmut Eller, 2010/09/18
- Re: e and pi, David Kastrup, 2010/09/18
- Re: e and pi, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/09/18
- Re: e and pi, Andreas Schwab, 2010/09/18
- Re: e and pi,
Stephen J. Turnbull <=
- RE: e and pi, Drew Adams, 2010/09/18
- Re: e and pi, Stefan Monnier, 2010/09/17
- Re: e and pi, Chong Yidong, 2010/09/17
- Re: e and pi, Stefan Monnier, 2010/09/18
- Re: e and pi, Chong Yidong, 2010/09/18
- Re: e and pi, Uday S Reddy, 2010/09/18
- RE: e and pi, Drew Adams, 2010/09/18
- Re: e and pi, Juanma Barranquero, 2010/09/18
- Re: e and pi, Stefan Monnier, 2010/09/18
- Re: e and pi, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2010/09/18