[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: C-x C-x

From: Andrew W. Nosenko
Subject: Re: C-x C-x
Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2010 02:59:26 +0300

On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 12:40, David Kastrup <address@hidden> wrote:
> "Andrew W. Nosenko" <address@hidden> writes:
>> On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 10:49, David Kastrup <address@hidden> wrote:
>>> "Andrew W. Nosenko" <address@hidden> writes:
>>>> About stop activating region by C-x C-x.  I'm (of course) unable to
>>>> speak for anyone who uses t-m-m, but for me C-x C-x, same as C-x C-x
>>>> C-x C-x is intentionally thing for activating region.  And usual goal
>>>> is to send this region to the external filter (as in C-x C-x C-u M-|).
>>> This works perfectly fine without activating the region first.
>> May be :-) But I'm personally feel self very uncomfortable when don't
>> see what going to be changed (the region in this concrete case).
> C-x C-x will show you the other end of the region just fine without
> needing to activate it.

Yes, but I said not about "whether it's technically works or not".  I
said about my _personal_ feelings and, therefore, preferences.  I'm
prefer to see what I'm "going to eat".  And the better way for me to
see a region is to have it highlighted.

Andrew W. Nosenko <address@hidden>

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]