[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs-diffs Digest, Vol 94, Issue 89
From: |
Chong Yidong |
Subject: |
Re: Emacs-diffs Digest, Vol 94, Issue 89 |
Date: |
Mon, 27 Sep 2010 11:33:48 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> writes:
>>> What would it be called? XIINT? Eek. Uhm. XNINT? (For "not long
>>> int.") :-) Ok, I have nothing.
>> IXINT?
>
> XINT would be the obvious name, but it's already taken.
> IXINT doesn't follow the "X..." convention we've used so far, but
> I won't oppose it. We could go with XINT_int, otherwise.
How about XINT for ints and XEINT for EMACS_INTs?
- Re: Emacs-diffs Digest, Vol 94, Issue 89, (continued)
Re: Emacs-diffs Digest, Vol 94, Issue 89, Stefan Monnier, 2010/09/24
- Re: Emacs-diffs Digest, Vol 94, Issue 89, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/09/25
- Re: Emacs-diffs Digest, Vol 94, Issue 89, Stefan Monnier, 2010/09/25
- Re: Emacs-diffs Digest, Vol 94, Issue 89, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2010/09/25
- Re: Emacs-diffs Digest, Vol 94, Issue 89, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/09/25
- Re: Emacs-diffs Digest, Vol 94, Issue 89, Stefan Monnier, 2010/09/26
- Re: Emacs-diffs Digest, Vol 94, Issue 89,
Chong Yidong <=
- Re: Emacs-diffs Digest, Vol 94, Issue 89, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2010/09/27
- Re: Emacs-diffs Digest, Vol 94, Issue 89, Stefan Monnier, 2010/09/27
- Re: Emacs-diffs Digest, Vol 94, Issue 89, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2010/09/27
- Re: Emacs-diffs Digest, Vol 94, Issue 89, Andreas Schwab, 2010/09/27
- Re: Emacs-diffs Digest, Vol 94, Issue 89, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/09/28
- Re: Emacs-diffs Digest, Vol 94, Issue 89, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2010/09/28
- Re: Emacs-diffs Digest, Vol 94, Issue 89, Stefan Monnier, 2010/09/28
Re: Emacs-diffs Digest, Vol 94, Issue 89, Davis Herring, 2010/09/29