Re: imagemagick support on W32

[Juanma Barranquero]

On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 13:36,  <address@hidden> wrote:

> I'm not sure what the original question was, but I intended for
> ImageMagick support to live alongside the other image loaders.

OK.

> There is, (imagemagick-types). You dont know for certain at compile time
> which formats are available, because imagemagick supports a plugin
> mechanism for new formats.

How does that integrate with image-types and image-type-available-p?

> so when jpeg
> support is compiled in, and imagemagick support is compiled in, the jpeg
> loader wins by default.

Seems sensible.

Thanks for explaining this,

    Juanma