[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: `set-variable' should use :set
|
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
|
Subject: |
Re: `set-variable' should use :set |
|
Date: |
Fri, 22 Oct 2010 09:39:54 +0200 |
> From: "Drew Adams" <address@hidden>
> Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 18:11:34 -0700
> Cc: 'Emacs-Devel devel' <address@hidden>
>
> However, I disagree that it is not that much more convenient than setq. For
> one
> thing, it respects the defcustom :type spec. For another, it uses a proper
> interactive spec. The type-checking in particular is a win, IMO.
To say nothing of the fact that set-variable provides completion,
while M-: does not.
- Re: `set-variable' should use :set, (continued)
- Re: `set-variable' should use :set, Juanma Barranquero, 2010/10/22
- Re: `set-variable' should use :set, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/10/23
- RE: `set-variable' should use :set, Drew Adams, 2010/10/23
- Re: `set-variable' should use :set, Juanma Barranquero, 2010/10/23
- Re: `set-variable' should use :set, Glenn Morris, 2010/10/23
- Re: `set-variable' should use :set, Jambunathan K, 2010/10/23
- Re: `set-variable' should use :set, Chong Yidong, 2010/10/24
- Re: `set-variable' should use :set, Stefan Monnier, 2010/10/22
- RE: `set-variable' should use :set, Drew Adams, 2010/10/22
- Re: `set-variable' should use :set, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/10/22
- Re: `set-variable' should use :set,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: `set-variable' should use :set, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/10/22
- Re: `set-variable' should use :set, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/10/22