[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Incorrect merge

From: Davis Herring
Subject: Re: Incorrect merge
Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2010 10:44:07 -0700 (PDT)
User-agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.8-5.el5_4.10.lanl3

> Another problem with your branch approach is that a patch applied
> (mistakenly) to emacs-23 rather than to emacs-common would end up lost.
> It's a lot easier to detect excess patches and lost patches.

Could we restrict emacs-23 so that only the merges (and explicit
maintainer action) could update it?  The number of branch-only patches is
small; it might not be too much trouble to rely on just a few people to
commit them.


This product is sold by volume, not by mass.  If it appears too dense or
too sparse, it is because mass-energy conversion has occurred during

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]