[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: simple useful functions
From: |
Tak Ota |
Subject: |
Re: simple useful functions |
Date: |
Wed, 3 Nov 2010 11:08:45 -0700 |
Wed, 3 Nov 2010 03:13:36 -0700: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <address@hidden> wrote:
> Andreas Röhler writes:
>
> > AFAIU `occur' selects lines, not strings.
>
> Sure, but the words "occur" and "occurance" don't imply
> line-oriented. IOW, that's an implementation detail AFAICS.
>
> You can argue this functionality doesn't belong in occur, but I don't
> think its current line-oriented implementation is a reason not to add
> it there. More to the point would be that `collect-string' might be
> most useful in Lisp programs, but `occur' is interactive. There may
> be other reasons, too. Note that the interactive vs. programmatic
> issue might very well be a problem with my clumsy implementation --
> that was just a proof of concept.
Try M-x collect-string. It is interactive. And recently in regard to
my work I most frequently use collect-string to extract specific URLs
from XML and HTML files. I rarely use it in Lisp programming.
> Even so, I think it belongs in the "occur-" namespace. I think it's
> most discoverable there.
>
> > Isn't `collect-string' an instructive example how to write simple and
> > effective code in Emacs Lisp?
>
> "Instructive examples" belong in the Elisp tutorial, not in the core
> code.
>
> The questions about `collect-string' should be, "Does this
> *functionality* belong in the core codebase? If so, where?"
This logic makes sense.
-Tak
- Re: simple useful functions, Tak Ota, 2010/11/01
- Re: simple useful functions, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/11/01
- Re: simple useful functions, Tak Ota, 2010/11/03
- Re: simple useful functions, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/11/03
- Re: simple useful functions, Tak Ota, 2010/11/03
- collect-string (was: simple useful functions), Stefan Monnier, 2010/11/04
- Re: collect-string (was: simple useful functions), Tak Ota, 2010/11/04
- Re: collect-string (was: simple useful functions), Tak Ota, 2010/11/04
- Re: collect-string (was: simple useful functions), Tak Ota, 2010/11/04
- Re: collect-string (was: simple useful functions), Andreas Röhler, 2010/11/05
- Re: collect-string, Stefan Monnier, 2010/11/08
- Re: collect-string, Tak Ota, 2010/11/08