[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Avoiding replies on emacs-diffs
From: |
Reiner Steib |
Subject: |
Re: Avoiding replies on emacs-diffs |
Date: |
Thu, 04 Nov 2010 08:27:34 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/22.1 (gnu/linux) |
On Thu, Nov 04 2010, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
> Karl Fogel writes:
> > Reiner Steib <address@hidden> writes:
> > >Adding a header "Mail-Followup-To: address@hidden" could help.
> >
> > Also: just set the 'Reply-to' header on emacs-diffs@ mails to go to
> > address@hidden
>
> Yeah, MFT is just plain beside-the-point here. (Besides being ignored
> by most MUAs in use, and even by a number of popular free software MUAs.)
It is respected by the default mail composition mode in Emacs. :-)
> Reply-To is pretty universally respected.
While I don't like Reply-To munging in "normal" lists, I agree to
Karl's arguments for emacs-diffs.
Is it possible to set M-F-T and Reply-To to emacs-diffs _and_ the
committer's address?
Bye, Reiner.
--
,,,
(o o)
---ooO-(_)-Ooo--- | PGP key available | http://rsteib.home.pages.de/
- Re: /srv/bzr/emacs/trunk r102179: Silence gnus-util.el compilation., Glenn Morris, 2010/11/01
- Re: /srv/bzr/emacs/trunk r102179: Silence gnus-util.el compilation., Stefan Monnier, 2010/11/01
- Re: Avoiding replies on emacs-diffs, Stefan Monnier, 2010/11/03
- Re: Avoiding replies on emacs-diffs, Karl Fogel, 2010/11/03
- Re: Avoiding replies on emacs-diffs, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/11/03
- Re: Avoiding replies on emacs-diffs, Stefan Monnier, 2010/11/04
- Re: Avoiding replies on emacs-diffs, Karl Fogel, 2010/11/04
- Re: Avoiding replies on emacs-diffs, Miles Bader, 2010/11/04
loading foo.el while foo-var is let-bound [was Re: /srv/bzr/emacs/trunk r102179: Silence gnus-util.el compilation.], Glenn Morris, 2010/11/01