[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [emacs-bidi] Treatment of LRE,RLE,LRO,RLO,PDF,LRM,RLM

From: Eli Zaretskii
Subject: Re: [emacs-bidi] Treatment of LRE,RLE,LRO,RLO,PDF,LRM,RLM
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2010 19:54:41 +0200

> From: Andreas Schwab <address@hidden>
> Cc: Kenichi Handa <address@hidden>,  address@hidden
> Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2010 13:55:07 +0100
> > It is annoying allright, but [U+1234][U+5678] is more readable than
> > U+1234U+5678.  However, if others disagree, I can change that back.
> \u1234\u5678 is even better.

I'm fine with that, too.  If no one objects, I will move to \uNNNN in
a couple of days.

Btw, how to display code points smaller than 256? \uNN or \u00NN?

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]