[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [emacs-bidi] Treatment of LRE,RLE,LRO,RLO,PDF,LRM,RLM

From: Eli Zaretskii
Subject: Re: [emacs-bidi] Treatment of LRE,RLE,LRO,RLO,PDF,LRM,RLM
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2010 22:07:20 +0200

> From: Stefan Monnier <address@hidden>
> Cc: Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden>, address@hidden,
>         Kenichi Handa <address@hidden>
> Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2010 08:24:57 -0500
> I largely agree, since it's more in keeping with the Emacs tradition,
> but again if digits follow, this is ambiguous: \u123456 (tho this could
> also be displayed as \u1234\ 56).

I think it's extremely unlikely to have \u1234 followed by 56, and we
already have that problem with octal escapes anyway.  Also, don't
forget that \u1234 is displayed in a special face, which makes it
stand out when followed by normal characters.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]