emacs-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: emacs-20101122 windows binaries


From: Lennart Borgman
Subject: Re: emacs-20101122 windows binaries
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 20:56:11 +0100

On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 8:52 PM, Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> wrote:
>> From: Lennart Borgman <address@hidden>
>> Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 20:28:33 +0100
>> Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 8:22 PM, Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> wrote:
>> >> From: Lennart Borgman <address@hidden>
>> >> Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 19:39:41 +0100
>> >> Cc: Sean Sieger <address@hidden>, address@hidden
>> >>
>> >> >>  - Releases should or should not include debug info?
>> >> >
>> >> > It is IMO slightly better to ship the release without debug info.
>> >>
>> >> Why not ship to versions of the release binaries, with and without debug 
>> >> info?
>> >
>> > Because it's pointless.  If we want to give users release binaries
>> > with debug info, we should just ship such a binary, period.
>>
>> Please explain why you think that.
>
> I just did, above.

In what way is "pointless" an explanation?



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]