[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?
From: |
Stephen J. Turnbull |
Subject: |
Re: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound? |
Date: |
Tue, 18 Jan 2011 12:03:25 +0900 |
grischka writes:
> > What I really hoped to discuss where the technical difficulties. Emacs
> > does not currently have a way to let key binding fall back to the OS
> > binding. I am not sure it is trivial and I have forgotten the details.
>
> It is nontrivial to say the least.
>
> Unlike XEmacs, GNU Emacs is still a console application at its heart.
> It wants to "read" events in a loop from an input stream until it
> finds them complete as a "key-sequence". No function seems to exist
> that could deal with events that are already read.
Surely (GNU) Emacs has a way (in Lisp, even) to "unread" a keystroke?
This kind of lookahead is the most convenient way to think about input
methods, for example.
Re: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, Christopher Allan Webber, 2011/01/05
Re: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, grischka, 2011/01/13
Re: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, grischka, 2011/01/17
RE: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, Drew Adams, 2011/01/17
- Re: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, Lennart Borgman, 2011/01/17
- RE: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, Drew Adams, 2011/01/17
- Re: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, Lennart Borgman, 2011/01/17
- RE: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, Drew Adams, 2011/01/17
- Re: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, Lennart Borgman, 2011/01/17
- RE: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, Drew Adams, 2011/01/17
- Re: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, Lennart Borgman, 2011/01/17