[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Proposed gnulib renames
From: |
Bruno Haible |
Subject: |
Re: Proposed gnulib renames |
Date: |
Thu, 27 Jan 2011 11:23:31 +0100 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9.9 |
> I disagree. The gnulib documentation ([1], paragraph 1) recommends to put also
> gnulib-cache.m4 into the repository.
>
> The reason is that when a file is renamed in gnulib or some module dependency
> is removed in gnulib, what happens at the next invocation of sync-from-gnulib?
Oops, I misspoke. The gnulib documentation does recommend to put
gnulib-cache.m4 into the repository, but this is only a convenience for
someone who wants to use the --add-import or --remove-import options
and therefore not really necessary. The file that needs to be kept so
that old files don't accumulate as garbage is gnulib-comp.m4.
Sorry for the confusion.
Bruno
- Re: Proposed gnulib renames, (continued)
- Re: Proposed gnulib renames, Eric Blake, 2011/01/26
- Re: Proposed gnulib renames, Paul Eggert, 2011/01/27
- Re: Proposed gnulib renames, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/01/27
- Re: Proposed gnulib renames, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/01/27
- Re: Proposed gnulib renames, Bruno Haible, 2011/01/27
- Re: Proposed gnulib renames, Paul Eggert, 2011/01/28
- Re: Proposed gnulib renames, Bruno Haible, 2011/01/27
- Re: Proposed gnulib renames,
Bruno Haible <=
- Re: Proposed gnulib renames, Paul Eggert, 2011/01/28
- Re: Files from gnulib, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/01/25
- Re: Files from gnulib, Jason Rumney, 2011/01/25
- Re: Files from gnulib, Stefan Monnier, 2011/01/25
- Re: Files from gnulib, Paul Eggert, 2011/01/25
- Re: Files from gnulib, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/01/25
- Re: Files from gnulib, Paul Eggert, 2011/01/25
- Re: Files from gnulib, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/01/25
- Re: Files from gnulib, Jim Meyering, 2011/01/26
- Re: Files from gnulib, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/01/26