[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: `C-h v' may offer too many symbols
|
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
|
Subject: |
Re: `C-h v' may offer too many symbols |
|
Date: |
Thu, 10 Mar 2011 23:29:18 -0500 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
> It makes sense, in a lexical world. However, currently you can do
> (defconst :mykeyword :mykeyword)
> and even if you add a docstring to that, I'm not sure it is sensible
> to show it as a completion of describe-variable...
Actually, if it has a docstring, it definitely makes sense. And if it
doesn't, then it's not that much of a problem to include those rare
cases in the completion.
Stefan
- `C-h v' may offer too many symbols, Ted Zlatanov, 2011/03/10
- Re: `C-h v' may offer too many symbols, Juanma Barranquero, 2011/03/10
- Re: `C-h v' may offer too many symbols, Stefan Monnier, 2011/03/10
- public APIs and private ones (Re: `C-h v' may offer too many symbols), Kenichi Handa, 2011/03/10
- RE: public APIs and private ones (Re: `C-h v' may offer too manysymbols), Drew Adams, 2011/03/11
- Re: public APIs and private ones (Re: `C-h v' may offer too many symbols), Ted Zlatanov, 2011/03/11
- Re: public APIs and private ones (Re: `C-h v' may offer too many symbols), Stefan Monnier, 2011/03/11