[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Effect of deletions on indirect buffers (Bug#8219)
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Effect of deletions on indirect buffers (Bug#8219) |
Date: |
Sat, 12 Mar 2011 11:01:45 +0200 |
> From: Stefan Monnier <address@hidden>
> Cc: Chong Yidong <address@hidden>, address@hidden, address@hidden
> Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 18:19:25 -0500
>
> I.e. any place where we use BUF_PT on something else than
> current_buffer, we have a bug waiting to happen unless we know for sure
> that that buffer is not indirect.
It follows that BUF_PT, when used on other than the current buffer
should update PT if necessary, if that buffer is an indirect buffer,
before returning the value. And the same with BUF_BEGV, BUF_ZV, etc.
Right?
- Effect of deletions on indirect buffers (Bug#8219), Chong Yidong, 2011/03/11
- Re: Effect of deletions on indirect buffers (Bug#8219), Eli Zaretskii, 2011/03/11
- Re: bug#8219: Effect of deletions on indirect buffers (Bug#8219), Chong Yidong, 2011/03/11
- Re: Effect of deletions on indirect buffers (Bug#8219), Stefan Monnier, 2011/03/11
- Re: Effect of deletions on indirect buffers (Bug#8219), Chong Yidong, 2011/03/13
- Re: bug#8219: Effect of deletions on indirect buffers (Bug#8219), Juanma Barranquero, 2011/03/13
- Re: bug#8219: Effect of deletions on indirect buffers (Bug#8219), Chong Yidong, 2011/03/14