[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Passing flags using vc-do-command
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: Passing flags using vc-do-command |
Date: |
Mon, 14 Mar 2011 09:43:50 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
> + (defvar vc-post-command-1-functions nil
> + "Hook run at the end of `vc-do-command-1'.
> + Each function is called inside the buffer in which the command
> + was run and is passed 4 arguments: the COMMAND, the FILE-OR-LIST,
> + the BEFORE-FLAGS and the AFTER-FLAGS.")
Do we really need that?
> ! (defun vc-do-command-1 (buffer okstatus command file-or-list
> ! &optional before-flag-or-list &rest after-flags)
I'd rather a nicer name for the new command.
And I'd like it to address some of the other needs of backends,
e.g. paying attention to vc-<backend>-program. So I think we should
look at the calls to vc-do-command (and to
call-process/start-process/...) in backends to try and design the
successor to vc-do-command.
Stefan
- Passing flags using vc-do-command, Lute Kamstra, 2011/03/07
- Re: Passing flags using vc-do-command, Stefan Monnier, 2011/03/07
- Re: Passing flags using vc-do-command, Lute Kamstra, 2011/03/09
- Re: Passing flags using vc-do-command, Lute Kamstra, 2011/03/12
- Re: Passing flags using vc-do-command, Lute Kamstra, 2011/03/14
- Re: Passing flags using vc-do-command,
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: Passing flags using vc-do-command, Lute Kamstra, 2011/03/14
- Re: Passing flags using vc-do-command, Stefan Monnier, 2011/03/14