[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: splitting ChangeLogs
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: splitting ChangeLogs |
Date: |
Thu, 07 Apr 2011 06:03:21 +0300 |
> From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <address@hidden>
> Cc: address@hidden,
> address@hidden
> Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2011 09:36:27 +0900
>
> Eli Zaretskii writes:
>
> > So what am I missing?
>
> The logs and diffs.
>
> If before for splitting ChangeLog, bzr log ChangeLog shows N
> revisions, after either of the procedures shown, one of ChangeLog and
> ChangeLog.11 has 1 revision, and the other has N+1. bzr diff does
> nothing useful with the newly added file. With a hypothetical bzr cp,
> both would have N+1, and bzr diff would work on both.
I think I see the light now. You are saying that with "bzr cp", the
DAG will still be (almost) the same, except that "bzr diff" and other
commands will simply act _as_if_ the new ChangeLog had the same
history as the old one. Right?
- splitting ChangeLogs, Juanma Barranquero, 2011/04/05
- Re: splitting ChangeLogs, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/04/05
- Re: splitting ChangeLogs, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2011/04/05
- Re: splitting ChangeLogs, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/04/06
- Re: splitting ChangeLogs, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2011/04/06
- Re: splitting ChangeLogs, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/04/06
- Re: splitting ChangeLogs, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2011/04/06
- Re: splitting ChangeLogs,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: splitting ChangeLogs, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2011/04/07
Re: splitting ChangeLogs, Glenn Morris, 2011/04/06
Re: splitting ChangeLogs, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/04/06
Re: splitting ChangeLogs, Stefan Monnier, 2011/04/06
Message not availableRe: splitting ChangeLogs, Stefan Monnier, 2011/04/06
Re: splitting ChangeLogs, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/04/06
Re: splitting ChangeLogs, Juanma Barranquero, 2011/04/06