[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Patch for PHP5 support for etags

From: Francesco Potortì
Subject: Re: Patch for PHP5 support for etags
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 14:25:43 +0200

>On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 3:17 PM, Francesco Potortì <address@hidden> wrote:
>> I have this old mail in my archive, to which I never got an answer.
>> Date: 12 Oct 2009 21:47:01 +0200
>> From: Francesco Potortì <address@hidden>
>> To: Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso <address@hidden>,
>>    Lennart Borgman <address@hidden>
>> CC: address@hidden
>> In-reply-to: <address@hidden> (address@hidden)
>> Subject: Re: [Fwd: [Patch] etags support for php5]
>>>Lennart Borgman (gmail) wrote:
>>>> Was this ever added to etags?
>>>Indeed, I'd like to know too. Was this ever added to etags? It doesn't look
>>>like it was, two years later.
>>>- Jordi G. H.
>> No, it wasn't.  I am guilty of not having solicited a response.  This is
>> a mail I sent long ago to which I did not receive any answer.  Again, my
>> fault to have forgotten this.  Would someone please reply?
>> ________________________________________________________________
>> Date: 17 Aug 2008 19:47:47 +0200
>> From: Francesco Potorti` <address@hidden>
>> To: Lennart Borgman <address@hidden>,
>>    Bas Kok <address@hidden>
>> Cc: Stefan Monnier <address@hidden>
>> In-reply-to: <address@hidden>
>> Subject: Re: [Lennart Borgman (gmail)] [Fwd: [Patch] etags support for php5]
>> Organization: ISTI-CNR, via Moruzzi 1, I-56124 Pisa, +39-0503153058
>> Dear Lennart and Bas,
>> thank you for your patch to etags to support php5 keywords, and sorry
>> for the delay in checking it.  I only managed to test it now, during my
>> vacations.
>> However, I obtain strange results from my tests, so I would ask you to
>> send me a php5 source file together with the expected results.
>I am not really involved, I just wanted to make sure the patch was
>applied (and tested).

Yes, I applied the patch.  I tested it and got strange results.  So I
need a php5 source file together with the expected results, so that I
can check it with more confidence.  Can you provide that, or point me to
someone else who can?

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]