[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Confusing "bzr log" as result of merges
|
From: |
Andreas Schwab |
|
Subject: |
Re: Confusing "bzr log" as result of merges |
|
Date: |
Sat, 21 May 2011 15:37:41 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (gnu/linux) |
Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:
> In that discussion, we agreed to mention in the commit message the
> versions that were reverse cherry-picked. But it looks like that
> agreement was never acted upon.
Apart from the fact that nothing was "reverse cherry-picked", how would
that change anything?
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, address@hidden
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
- Re: Confusing "bzr log" as result of merges, (continued)
Re: Confusing "bzr log" as result of merges, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/05/21
Re: Confusing "bzr log" as result of merges, Sven Joachim, 2011/05/21
Re: Confusing "bzr log" as result of merges, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/05/21
Re: Confusing "bzr log" as result of merges, Óscar Fuentes, 2011/05/21