[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Uhm... weird frame behaviour

From: Eli Zaretskii
Subject: Re: Uhm... weird frame behaviour
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2011 19:20:17 +0300

> Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2011 19:01:36 +0300
> From: Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden>
> CC: address@hidden, address@hidden
> > (#<frame address@hidden 0xf43590> #<frame F1 0xb6e7d0>)
> > 
> > I have no idea what frame F1 is. The only displayed frame is
> > address@hidden', which is what `emacsclient -c -n' creates.
> Frames whose names are F1, F2, etc. are terminal frames.  Is it
> possible that the demonic Emacs doesn't delete the initial terminal
> frame, like an otherwise "normal" interactive session would?

Answering my own question: yes, that's what happens.

So Martin, I think other_visible_frames should be augmented for the
fact that when IS_DAEMON is non-zero, there's one frame that is always
there and does not constitute "other frames".

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]