[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Slow/poor responsiveness in org files
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Slow/poor responsiveness in org files |
Date: |
Tue, 13 Sep 2011 01:51:41 -0400 |
> Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2011 00:36:25 -0400
> From: Mathieu Boespflug <address@hidden>
> Cc: address@hidden
>
> > I will propose to Org mode developers a change to set
> > bidi-paragraph-direction automatically on all Org buffers.
>
> Ok. Thank you for looking into this. However, does this mean it won't be
> possible to have R2L text in Org buffers?
No, it doesn't mean that. It just means the display will start at the
left window boundary, even if the item includes R2L text. To
illustrate, you will see
* foo
* bar
* OOF
* RAB
(where "OOF" and "RAB" are R2L text typed as "FOO" and "BAR",
reordered into correct visual order), rather than
* foo
* bar
OOF *
RAB *
with the default (nil) setting of bidi-paragraph-direction. I think
the latter is ugly anyway.
The variable that controls reordering is bidi-display-reordering, and
it must stay non-nil if we want to support R2L text.
The Emacs manual and the ELisp manual have more information about the
meaning of bidi-paragraph-direction, if you want to learn more.
- Re: Slow/poor responsiveness in org files, Mathieu Boespflug, 2011/09/12
- Re: Slow/poor responsiveness in org files, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/09/12
- Re: Slow/poor responsiveness in org files, Bruno Tavernier, 2011/09/13
- Re: Slow/poor responsiveness in org files, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/09/14
- Re: Slow/poor responsiveness in org files, Bruno Tavernier, 2011/09/14
- Re: Slow/poor responsiveness in org files, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/09/14