[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Uhm... weird frame behaviour

From: martin rudalics
Subject: Re: Uhm... weird frame behaviour
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2011 20:27:40 +0200
User-agent: Thunderbird (Windows/20090302)

> I've fixed this directly in window-deletable-p.

Thanks.  Apparently

           (not (eq (next-frame nil 0) (selected-frame))))

which is in `bury-buffer' should do the same.  Do you see any

>> Then I'll revert to the previous behavior which kills the frame even if it
>> has some buffer it could show instead.
> Note sure what you mean.  Wouldn't that make the frame deletion even
> more aggressive?

Hopefully not.  The drawback now is that with `pop-up-frames' non-nil

C-h k RET
M-x prev-buffer
M-x next-buffer

will delete the frame although it could show the buffer shown by
`prev-buffer' instead.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]