[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: ELPA update

From: Stephen J. Turnbull
Subject: Re: ELPA update
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 21:26:34 +0900

Ted Zlatanov writes:

 > I don't see what's wrong with my proposal to have a `elpa-dev' branch
 > for unstable and `elpa-stable' for stable packages; merging `elpa' into
 > `elpa-dev' will be a much clearer sign to publish a new version than
 > incrementing the version number (which, as we know, is often
 > unparseable).

Nothing.  I was responding to P.J.'s suggestion, which wasn't bad

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]