[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Should undefined behavior be encouraged in Emacs?
|
From: |
Drew Adams |
|
Subject: |
RE: Should undefined behavior be encouraged in Emacs? |
|
Date: |
Sat, 8 Oct 2011 07:34:53 -0700 |
> Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <address@hidden> writes:
> > like (I'm assuming) all other oldey-timey Emacs users :-), disabled
> > `transient-mark-mode'
>
> Hmm, no. I like transient-mark-mode.
incf - in fact, `delete-selection-mode'.
But I did note the smiley. I think (hope) Lars was being ironic.
- Re: Should undefined behavior be encouraged in Emacs?, (continued)
- Re: Should undefined behavior be encouraged in Emacs?, Alan Mackenzie, 2011/10/07
- Re: Should undefined behavior be encouraged in Emacs?, Barry Warsaw, 2011/10/07
- Re: Should undefined behavior be encouraged in Emacs?, ken manheimer, 2011/10/07
- Re: Should undefined behavior be encouraged in Emacs?, Barry Warsaw, 2011/10/07
- Re: Should undefined behavior be encouraged in Emacs?, Óscar Fuentes, 2011/10/07
- Re: Should undefined behavior be encouraged in Emacs?, ken manheimer, 2011/10/07
- RE: Should undefined behavior be encouraged in Emacs?, Drew Adams, 2011/10/07
- Re: Should undefined behavior be encouraged in Emacs?, Miles Bader, 2011/10/08
- RE: Should undefined behavior be encouraged in Emacs?,
Drew Adams <=
- Re: Should undefined behavior be encouraged in Emacs?, Stefan Monnier, 2011/10/03
Re: Should undefined behavior be encouraged in Emacs?, Alan Mackenzie, 2011/10/03
Re: Should undefined behavior be encouraged in Emacs?, Andreas Schwab, 2011/10/03
Re: Should undefined behavior be encouraged in Emacs?, Richard Stallman, 2011/10/03
Re: Should undefined behavior be encouraged in Emacs?, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/10/03