[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Rethinking count-words-region
From: |
Alan Mackenzie |
Subject: |
Re: Rethinking count-words-region |
Date: |
Sat, 8 Oct 2011 18:29:53 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
Hi, everybody.
On Sat, Oct 08, 2011 at 11:25:31AM -0700, Drew Adams wrote:
> > > If you define a command that does multiple things, then try
> > > to find a name that expresses that.
> > The old count-lines-region also reported a character count, and
> > Unix's `wc' also reports lines and characters. I suggest living
> > with it.
> 2 (or 3) wrongs don't make a right. ;-)
How about `count-lwc' and `count-lwc-region'? These names are short,
accurate, mnemonic and are reminiscent of the *nix `wc'.
--
Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).
- Re: Rethinking count-words-region, (continued)
- Re: Rethinking count-words-region, Jambunathan K, 2011/10/07
- Re: Rethinking count-words-region, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/10/07
- Re: Rethinking count-words-region, Chong Yidong, 2011/10/07
- Re: Rethinking count-words-region, Chong Yidong, 2011/10/07
- Re: Rethinking count-words-region, Andreas Röhler, 2011/10/08
- RE: Rethinking count-words-region, Drew Adams, 2011/10/08
- Re: Rethinking count-words-region, Chong Yidong, 2011/10/08
- RE: Rethinking count-words-region, Drew Adams, 2011/10/08
- Re: Rethinking count-words-region,
Alan Mackenzie <=
- Re: Rethinking count-words-region, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2011/10/08
- Re: Rethinking count-words-region, Juri Linkov, 2011/10/08
- Re: Rethinking count-words-region, Andreas Röhler, 2011/10/08
- Re: Rethinking count-words-region, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/10/08
Re: Rethinking count-words-region, Andreas Röhler, 2011/10/07
Re: Rethinking count-words-region, Alan Mackenzie, 2011/10/07
Re: Rethinking count-words-region, Chong Yidong, 2011/10/08