[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: quit-window
From: |
Christoph Scholtes |
Subject: |
Re: quit-window |
Date: |
Mon, 24 Oct 2011 19:00:01 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.90 (windows-nt) |
martin rudalics <address@hidden> writes:
> W'de have to handle this test
>
> (if Info-standalone
> (save-buffers-kill-emacs)
> (quit-window)))
>
> somehow without creating surprises for people using the standalone
> version.
What surprises are you thinking of?
> You might also try patching (some of) them right away so we know whether
> there are any pitfalls ;-)
Yes, for short term the most annoying instancse can be fixed without a hook.
> The problem is that the more hooks we have in one call, the more the
> order in which these hooks are executed does matter. For example, I
> believe that when I run `kill-buffer', `kill-buffer-hook' is called
> before `window-configuration-change-hook'. When I run `quit-window'
> with the first argument t, the order seems
> `window-configuration-change-hook', `kill-buffer-hook', and possibly
> another `window-configuration-change-hook' if the buffer was displayed
> in a second window. This is already very confusing for me in current
> Emacs.
That does seem confusing. I wonder why there are differences.
- Re: quit-window, (continued)
- Re: quit-window, martin rudalics, 2011/10/23
- Re: quit-window, Juri Linkov, 2011/10/23
- Re: quit-window, Christoph Scholtes, 2011/10/23
- Re: quit-window, martin rudalics, 2011/10/23
- Re: quit-window, Juri Linkov, 2011/10/24
- Re: quit-window, Chong Yidong, 2011/10/24
- Re: quit-window, Juri Linkov, 2011/10/25
Re: quit-window, Christoph Scholtes, 2011/10/23