[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: smtp crap
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: smtp crap |
Date: |
Wed, 26 Oct 2011 21:00:33 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.90 (gnu/linux) |
>> Users reporting a bug with `emacs -Q' should not have to specify ANYTHING
>> about
>> email methods.
Users have no reason to report bugs with "emacs -Q". I won't stand in
their way if they want to do so, but it is a use-case that
I consider irrelevant.
> The usual workflow is to save backtraces and other bug report relevant
> data into files, quit Emacs, start Emacs without -Q and then do the
> bug report submission.
Almost, except that the "Emacs without -Q" doesn't need to be started,
since it's been running for the last few days at least.
Stefan
- RE: smtp crap, (continued)
- RE: smtp crap, Drew Adams, 2011/10/11
- RE: smtp crap, Drew Adams, 2011/10/11
- RE: smtp crap, Drew Adams, 2011/10/26
- Re: smtp crap, Adam Sjøgren, 2011/10/26
- Re: smtp crap, chad, 2011/10/26
- RE: smtp crap, Drew Adams, 2011/10/26
- Re: smtp crap, chad, 2011/10/26
- RE: smtp crap, Drew Adams, 2011/10/26
- Re: smtp crap, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2011/10/26
- Re: smtp crap, Tim Cross, 2011/10/26
- Re: smtp crap,
Stefan Monnier <=
Re: smtp crap, Michael Welsh Duggan, 2011/10/08
smtp crap, Miles Bader, 2011/10/07