[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Why all the Alt bindings by default?
From: |
Drew Adams |
Subject: |
RE: Why all the Alt bindings by default? |
Date: |
Thu, 27 Oct 2011 08:20:16 -0700 |
> I think these Alt bindings should either be removed, or turned into
> function-key-map bindings (so they don't take precedence over real key
> bindings). Also we should address the problem that those key-bindings
> are only present after loading iso-transl.el.
That would be good, I think. Or else list them separately, with their own
header, at the end of the buffer (so they don't get in the way).
Likewise, C-x 8 bindings?
- Re: Why all the Alt bindings by default?, (continued)
- Re: Why all the Alt bindings by default?, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/10/27
- Re: Why all the Alt bindings by default?, Tim Cross, 2011/10/27
- RE: Why all the Alt bindings by default?, Drew Adams, 2011/10/27
- Re: Why all the Alt bindings by default?, Andreas Schwab, 2011/10/27
- RE: Why all the Alt bindings by default?, Drew Adams, 2011/10/27
- Re: Why all the Alt bindings by default?, Andreas Schwab, 2011/10/27
- RE: Why all the Alt bindings by default?, Drew Adams, 2011/10/27
- Re: Why all the Alt bindings by default?, Stefan Monnier, 2011/10/27
- RE: Why all the Alt bindings by default?,
Drew Adams <=
- Re: Why all the Alt bindings by default?, Stefan Monnier, 2011/10/27
Re: Why all the Alt bindings by default?, Stefan Monnier, 2011/10/26
Re: Why all the Alt bindings by default?, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/10/26