[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3
|
From: |
Johan Bockgård |
|
Subject: |
Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3 |
|
Date: |
Sat, 29 Oct 2011 03:10:29 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.90 (gnu/linux) |
(Sorry about the multiple posts.)
martin rudalics <address@hidden> writes:
> `new-window-below' and `new-window-on-right'. The "split-" prefix has
> purely operational connotation and application programmers as users are
> only interested in the state produced but hardly how it was obtained.
More lispy would be make-window-below etc. (Cf make-frame.)
- Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3, (continued)
- Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3, martin rudalics, 2011/10/26
- RE: C-x 2 and C-x 3, Drew Adams, 2011/10/29
- Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3, Richard Stallman, 2011/10/29
- Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3, martin rudalics, 2011/10/30
- Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3, Richard Stallman, 2011/10/30
Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3, Stefan Monnier, 2011/10/29
Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3, anerbenartzi, 2011/10/26