[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3

From: Chong Yidong
Subject: Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3
Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2011 17:50:16 +0800
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.90 (gnu/linux)

martin rudalics <address@hidden> writes:

>> More lispy would be make-window-below etc. (Cf make-frame.)
> Yes.  I'd go for that.

The split-window terminology is too widely used for this.  We have tons
of functions and variables named `split-{height|width}-threshold',
`split-window-sensibly', `split-window', `window-splittable-p',
etc. etc.  So I don't think it would be wise to give C-x 2 and C-x 3
anything other than names of the form split-window-FOO.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]