[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3

From: martin rudalics
Subject: Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3
Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2011 12:27:42 +0200
User-agent: Thunderbird (Windows/20090302)

> The split-window terminology is too widely used for this.  We have tons
> of functions and variables named `split-{height|width}-threshold',
> `split-window-sensibly', `split-window', `window-splittable-p',
> etc. etc.  So I don't think it would be wise to give C-x 2 and C-x 3
> anything other than names of the form split-window-FOO.

`split-window' should be renamed to `make-window'.  The others relate
exclusively to the buffer display functions so the "split-" references
are misleading anyway.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]