[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Your changes in revision 106240
From: |
Paul Eggert |
Subject: |
Re: Your changes in revision 106240 |
Date: |
Sun, 30 Oct 2011 00:15:34 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20110929 Thunderbird/7.0.1 |
On 10/29/11 23:31, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> it could be `char' or `short' and that would work just as well
But by that line of reasoning, the parameter could be 'bool', which
would also work just as well, so long as one likes the arbitrary
limit of 1 that is imposed by 'bool'.
We should avoid arbitrary limits on the lengths of data structures.
Limiting that list length to 1, or to 255, or to 65535, would impose
an arbitrary limit.
- Your changes in revision 106240, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/10/29
- Re: Your changes in revision 106240, Paul Eggert, 2011/10/29
- Re: Your changes in revision 106240, Stefan Monnier, 2011/10/30
- Re: Your changes in revision 106240, Paul Eggert, 2011/10/30
- Re: Your changes in revision 106240, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/10/30
- Re: Your changes in revision 106240, Stefan Monnier, 2011/10/30
- Re: Your changes in revision 106240,
Paul Eggert <=
- Re: Your changes in revision 106240, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/10/30
- Re: Your changes in revision 106240, Paul Eggert, 2011/10/31
- Re: Your changes in revision 106240, Stefan Monnier, 2011/10/30
- Re: Your changes in revision 106240, Paul Eggert, 2011/10/31
- Re: Your changes in revision 106240, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/10/30
- Re: Your changes in revision 106240, Paul Eggert, 2011/10/30