[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Windows' "split status"
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: Windows' "split status" |
Date: |
Wed, 16 Nov 2011 08:34:14 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.91 (gnu/linux) |
> Good idea, but I think `window-combination-limit' fits existing Emacs
> terminology better. We could let a value of `t' have the binary window
> tree behavior for now, and defer numerical values for post-release.
I still don't understand in which circumstance you'd want a limit other
than "2" or "infinity".
Stefan
- Re: Windows' "split status", (continued)
- Re: Windows' "split status", martin rudalics, 2011/11/25
- Re: Windows' "split status", Nix, 2011/11/25
- Re: Windows' "split status", Eli Zaretskii, 2011/11/25
- Re: Windows' "split status", Nix, 2011/11/25
- Re: Windows' "split status", martin rudalics, 2011/11/25
- Re: Windows' "split status", martin rudalics, 2011/11/25
- Re: Windows' "split status", martin rudalics, 2011/11/15
- Re: Windows' "split status", Juri Linkov, 2011/11/15
- Re: Windows' "split status", Chong Yidong, 2011/11/16
- Re: Windows' "split status", martin rudalics, 2011/11/16
- Re: Windows' "split status",
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: Windows' "split status", Juri Linkov, 2011/11/16
- Re: Windows' "split status", martin rudalics, 2011/11/17