Re: immediate strings #2

[Ken Raeburn]

On Nov 28, 2011, at 12:33, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> I don't know any C compiler able to allocate unions at the bit level, so
> the above struct will have the following layout:

The union still must be addressable (even without a tag or typedefname, the 
address could be converted to void* and used for something, in theory), so 
non-byte-aligned addressing would be broken anyways (assuming a lack of 
bit-level addressing in pointers, which exists but isn't common).

Ken