Re: GnuTLS for W32

[Juanma Barranquero]

2012/1/6 Ted Zlatanov <address@hidden>:

> I meant Emacs, the software, not just its binary form.  Forget the
> binaries; you and Lars are protesting a startup check that critical
> packages like GnuTLS are not out of date.

When you say that, you are not talking about gnutls.el, you are
talking about the GnuTLS binary, so no, I cannot forget the binaries.
That's the whole point of the discussion (at least, of the part of the
discussion I'm involved in).

> I can't think of a better way to
> notify them that an Emacs component is out of date and possibly
> compromising their security.

The GnuTLS binary is *not* an "Emacs component".

    Juanma