[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Patch for lookaround assertion in regexp
From: |
Tom |
Subject: |
Re: Patch for lookaround assertion in regexp |
Date: |
Mon, 23 Jan 2012 14:44:21 +0000 (UTC) |
User-agent: |
Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) |
Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca> writes:
>
> OTOH, noone has submitted code to replace the current regexp engine, and
> I don't forsee I'll have the time to write it myself, so maybe I should
> just give up on this plan.
>
Why not use simply PCRE with a bridge layer which translates from emacs
regexp format to PCRE? AFAIK the emacs regexes are more or less a subset
of PCRE, so the translation shouldn't be very difficult.
Why reinvent the wheel when PCRE is already there?
- Patch for lookaround assertion in regexp, Colin Fraizer, 2012/01/23
- Re: Patch for lookaround assertion in regexp, Stefan Monnier, 2012/01/23
- Re: Patch for lookaround assertion in regexp,
Tom <=
- Re: Patch for lookaround assertion in regexp, Andreas Schwab, 2012/01/23
- Re: Patch for lookaround assertion in regexp, Tom, 2012/01/23
- Re: Patch for lookaround assertion in regexp, Andreas Schwab, 2012/01/23
- Re: Patch for lookaround assertion in regexp, Stefan Monnier, 2012/01/23
- Re: Patch for lookaround assertion in regexp, Štěpán Němec, 2012/01/23
- Re: Patch for lookaround assertion in regexp, Juri Linkov, 2012/01/29
- Re: Patch for lookaround assertion in regexp, Stefan Monnier, 2012/01/23
Re: Patch for lookaround assertion in regexp, Nikolai Weibull, 2012/01/24