[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: CL package serious deficiencies
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: CL package serious deficiencies |
Date: |
Mon, 06 Feb 2012 16:08:56 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.92 (gnu/linux) |
> Hello to everyone ! In this message I would like to share my (mostly
> negative) experience with CL package of Elisp. I'm sure, some Emacs/Elisp
> gurus are already familiar with many of these, but I still believe I have to
> say something new. Let's start.
Elisp is not Common-Lisp. CL does try to provide some CL-style
functionality, but indeed it has some rough edges in this regard. It is
much better to look at it as a handy toolbox, whose design was inspired
by the experience of Common-Lisp, than to look at it as a "Common-Lisp
compatibility layer".
The points you raise sound like bugs indeed. We welcome patches to fix
them, but I personally won't spend much time tracking those bugs down,
because my experience with this part of CL is that it's not always easy
to dig into it (it's *very* lightly commented for one, and parts of it
are fundamentally broken).
Stefan
- CL package serious deficiencies, egnarts-ms, 2012/02/06
- Re: CL package serious deficiencies,
Stefan Monnier <=
- RE: CL package serious deficiencies, Drew Adams, 2012/02/06
- Re: CL package serious deficiencies, Stefan Monnier, 2012/02/06
- Re: CL package serious deficiencies, egnarts-ms, 2012/02/07
- Re: CL package serious deficiencies, Stefan Monnier, 2012/02/07
- Re: CL package serious deficiencies, egnarts-ms, 2012/02/08
- Re: CL package serious deficiencies, Stefan Monnier, 2012/02/08
- RE: CL package serious deficiencies, egnarts-ms, 2012/02/07
- Re: CL package serious deficiencies, Nix, 2012/02/07
- Re: CL package serious deficiencies, Lennart Borgman, 2012/02/07
- Re: CL package serious deficiencies, Juanma Barranquero, 2012/02/07