[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: glyphless
|
From: |
Andreas Schwab |
|
Subject: |
Re: glyphless |
|
Date: |
Sun, 25 Mar 2012 21:19:15 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.94 (gnu/linux) |
Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:
> I though Andreas said that using 25 here, so that the entire member
> fits in 32 bits, would be better (performance-wise, I presume)?
I guess the difference, if any, will be lost in the noise (glyphless
chars are rare anyway).
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, address@hidden
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."