[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: patch vs. overwrite in bzr
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: patch vs. overwrite in bzr |
Date: |
Fri, 06 Apr 2012 12:57:40 +0300 |
> From: Bastien <address@hidden>
> Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden, address@hidden
> Date: Fri, 06 Apr 2012 11:20:18 +0200
>
> Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:
>
> >> From: Bastien <address@hidden>
> >> Cc: Stefan Monnier <address@hidden>, address@hidden, address@hidden
> >> Date: Fri, 06 Apr 2012 10:29:13 +0200
> >>
> >> Regular Org testers don't want to rebuild Emacs each time they have
> >> to test a new feature in Org.
> >
> > Why would they need to do that? Org is not preloaded into Emacs, so
> > all you need is compile the new Org files and perhaps restart the
> > Emacs session, but not rebuild Emacs.
>
> Right. But there are other problems.
>
> - Updating to the latest Org via `bzr update' would take longer compared
> to the current `git pull' (several factors here...)
Like what? And how much faster is "faster"?
I believe this is just the general git-preference issue, which has
nothing to do with "faster".
> - Some people don't have access to their Emacs installation (at work,
> for example) and still want the latest Org.
Well, that's what site-lisp and/or load-path are for, right? That's
how those users install Org right now anyway, I believe. They can
continue doing that if Org were to be maintained as part of the Emacs
repository.
> And surely more. In any case, I'm all in favor of having the most
> recent Org in Emacs trunk regularily, but migrating the development
> of Org from the separate git repo to Emacs bzr repo is a no-go.
I understand, and I think this is the _only_ real issue involved.
- Re: patch vs. overwrite in bzr, (continued)
- Re: patch vs. overwrite in bzr, Stefan Monnier, 2012/04/04
- Re: patch vs. overwrite in bzr, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/04/04
- Re: patch vs. overwrite in bzr, Stefan Monnier, 2012/04/05
- Re: patch vs. overwrite in bzr, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2012/04/05
- Re: patch vs. overwrite in bzr, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/04/05
- Re: patch vs. overwrite in bzr, Ted Zlatanov, 2012/04/05
- Re: patch vs. overwrite in bzr, Richard Stallman, 2012/04/06
- Re: patch vs. overwrite in bzr, Bastien, 2012/04/06
- Re: patch vs. overwrite in bzr, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/04/06
- Re: patch vs. overwrite in bzr, Bastien, 2012/04/06
- Re: patch vs. overwrite in bzr,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: patch vs. overwrite in bzr, Bastien, 2012/04/06
- Re: patch vs. overwrite in bzr, chad, 2012/04/06
- Re: patch vs. overwrite in bzr, joakim, 2012/04/06
- Re: patch vs. overwrite in bzr, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/04/06
- Re: patch vs. overwrite in bzr, Óscar Fuentes, 2012/04/06
- Re: patch vs. overwrite in bzr, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/04/07
- Re: patch vs. overwrite in bzr, Óscar Fuentes, 2012/04/07
- Re: patch vs. overwrite in bzr, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/04/07
- Re: patch vs. overwrite in bzr, Óscar Fuentes, 2012/04/07
- Re: patch vs. overwrite in bzr, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/04/07