[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Tue, 08 May 2012 10:11:28 +0900
Wanderlust/2.14.0 (Africa) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.8 (Shijō) APEL/10.6 Emacs/22.3 (sparc-sun-solaris2.8) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI)
>>>>> On Mon, 7 May 2012 19:20:35 +0200, Simon Leinen <address@hidden> said:
>>> Is anyone already working for supporting multiple types of
>>> graphical terminals simultaneously?
>> Simon Leinen wanted to work on this a while ago, but I haven't
>> heard back from him about it, so I expect he was sufficiently busy
>> with other problems
> Unfortunately that's exactly true. I never really got started with
> it, and won't get to it in the near or medium future. However I'm
> more than willing to help test this if someone does start
> implementing this.
>> It would be a great to be able to use a single Emacs that can
>> display on a w32 display as well as X11 remote displays.
> For me the motivation was similar (except Mac/NextStep instead of
> w32), but my current workaround is to just use X11 on the Mac.
> Improved TTY/X11(/...) coexistence could be another benefit.
> I allow myself to quote some useful hints from a private mail you
> sent me then (almost three years ago):
Thanks for the info. I guess adding a new type of output-only
graphical terminal for printing is much easier than supporting
multiple types of GUI terminals, because we don't have to care about
event handling for the former.
Re: Printing, Stefan Monnier, 2012/05/07